Taking the Language Back from Anti-gunners

Share Button

Language is a tool of communication and persuasion.  In today’s world, marketing firms and political action groups spend uncountable sums of money to convince us to purchase products or support candidates and causes.  With the advent of mass marketing, manipulating the masses into the desired group-think is the goal each of these organizations strive for.

It should not be surprising that the language many organizations use is twisted in order to create sympathy for their cause.  The target currently in my sights are those who misuse language and misrepresent themselves in order to hide their true purposes and opinions.

Here are a list of words/terms we as a pro-firearm community need to take back from the gun grabbers and elitists who do not believe in our intrinsic right to self defense.

Active Shooter

I am an active shooter.  I usually try to go shooting and practice my skills at least every other week.  I compete in both International Defensive Pistol Association (IDPA) competitions and 3-Gun competitions.  I take classes to learn and improve my shooting skills and I teach defensive shooting to students in my region.  I shoot several thousand rounds of ammunition each year.  This is the definition of active shooter that I know…. someone who is active in the shooting sports and firearms-centric community.

The terminology the mainstream media should use (but they will never pass over a chance to try and beat down the pro-gun community) is active killer or active murderer.  It doesn’t matter what implement the bad guy uses if they are intent on harming as many people as possible.  Thus the perpetrator should be described based on his actions and not on an inanimate object.

Assault Rifle/AR-15

Assault is an action, not an object.  Sure, if I were the guy storming into an enemy compound in the tribal regions of Afghanistan or Pakistan to take out Ayman al Zawahiri, maybe I could get the term assault weapon.  I would be assaulting the bad guy.  It is unlikely I will be tasked with such a mission though.

The rifle used by the average citizen to protect themselves, their loved ones and their communities is a defensive rifle.  Or, if you want to describe the mechanisms of action, it can be called a semi-automatic rifle.  If you are using it for competition shooting an appropriate term would be Modern Sporting Rifle.

While I am at it, this is a dead-horse I insist on beating.  The “AR” in AR-15 DOES NOT stand for Assault Rifle. The “AR” is an abbreviation for the company that designed the rifle, Armalite.  The AR-15 is a rifle that was patterned after a rifle developed by Eugene Stoner for the Armalite company in 1955.  This rifle has been around for many years more than the disarmament industry has had it as a main target.

Gun Safety

Gun safety is a series of actions/protocols and a mindset a responsible individual employs mitigate any harm that an object under human control may create.  Gun safety is the four cardinal rules every responsible instructor and parent teaches when a new person is learning about firearms.  Gun safety is education about the proper and responsible use of firearms.

Gun safety is not legislation that hampers an individuals right to keep and bear arms.  Gun safety is not a sign on a public building which renders an individual with less efficient means of self-defense because an inanimate object makes people feel uncomfortable.

Reasonable Restrictions

Reasonable requires the root word reason.  Reason is a logical determination based upon quality data.  Reason is the ability to think rationally through a problem.

There are over 100,000 defensive uses of firearms every year in the United States.  There are reports that teens have used their mothers/fathers guns to defend themselves from home invaders and violent felons while home alone and otherwise without an adult to defend them.  Women successfully use firearms to defend themselves from rape daily.  Elderly individuals, who are no longer physically able fight back against a muscle bound 220 pound criminal, have defended their lives with guns.

The rationalization for placing restrictions on law-abiding citizens contains no hint of reason.  If you want to prosecute crimes done by those who misuse guns, have at it… but restricting firearm ownership under the guise that it is reasonable is an abject falsehood.

High-Capacity Firearms/Clips

First… a magazine is a detachable “box”-like container with a spring and follower system that contains ammunition and helps to feed ammunition into the firearm’s action.  It is not a clip.  A clip is a bracket made out of spring steel that is no longer used to todays modern firearms designs.  It is important, that we as firearms owners use the proper terminology when educating others in a respectful manner.

What is high capacity?  I don’t actually know what high-capacity means.  I have many standard capacity firearms.  They are the standard design the manufactures lawfully intended and constructed.  I have standard capacity handguns where the magazine contains 15-20 rounds.  I have standard capacity rifles where the magazine contains 30-40 rounds.  The firearms were designed with the original intent to hold those standard amounts.  Why then is the arbitrary term of “high-capacity” given any validity whatsoever?

In defensive shooting, I would want to have as many rounds available as it take to stop the threat against myself or another innocent human being.  I would rather not have to reload multiple times when several criminals try to break into my home with intent to harm those living there.  In a defensive situation, there is not a capacity I consider high enough until the altercation is over and I am safe again.

And the media really needs to understand the difference between a magazine and a clip.  Words have meaning and if you want to even sound educated, you should know what those words mean.

High-powered Rifle

I can not tell you how many media outlets have referred to the .223 caliber/5.56 mm cartridge used in a AR-15 as high-powered.  Every time I hear this statement I cringe.  The .223 caliber projectile is actually rather anemic.  In many states, it is not even considered powerful enough to hunt deer with.  Can it be affective defensively?  Yes it can.  Is it going to vaporize everything in its path?  Nope.

Comparatively, the .223/5.56 round used in AR-15s is considerably smaller than one of the most popular hunting rounds in the market today, the .308.


Share Button